Considering Alternative Conceptual Models: The Pahute Mesa Flow Model

Gregory J. Ruskauff1 and Andrew V. Wolfsberg2

1 INTERA Inc., gruskauff@intera.com, Las Vegas, NV, USA
2 Los Alamos National Laboratory, awolf@lanl.gov, Los Alamos, NM, USA

ABSTRACT

Underground nuclear testing via deep vertical shafts was conducted at the Nevada Test Site (NTS) from 1951 until 1992. The Pahute Mesa area of the NTS was used for 27 years, and was an area where many of the larger yield tests were conducted. As a consequence of testing, radionuclides were left behind in unsaturated and saturated rocks. The Underground Testing Area (UGTA) Project is currently conducting characterization investigations to ensure the protection of the public and the environment, and one of these activities is the construction and calibration of a flow model, which is described here. The Pahute Mesa area has a great depth to groundwater, and exhaustive characterization is not possible. The issue is further compounded by the complexity associated with multiple calderas and basin-andrange faulting in the area. In addition, recharge is highly uncertain in this arid region. Thus, two highlevel conceptual uncertainties, in the geologic framework and in the water balance, are present. The UGTA Project recognizes this high-level uncertainty, and has addressed it by considering a matrix of 7 geologic models and 3 estimates of recharge from widely differing methods (chloride mass balance, empirical Maxey-Eakin, and distributed rainfall-runoff). Fifteen different combinations of geologic and recharge models were calibrated.

Several of the alternative models produced flow fields that, considering calibration metrics alone, were nearly indistinguishable from the expected model. However, some of the models were substantially different. Extensive use of automated parameter estimation software (PEST) to run the FEHM forward models was required, along with the use of distributed computing clusters.